Words: 3672
Especially in the draft stage, can lead you’ve one intrinsically interesting problem to another, then another, ND then You may windup following a garden of forking paths and lose your way. To prevent this, stop periodically. Vile drafting your essay and reread the assignment. Its purposes are likely to become clearer. Consider the assignment in relation to previous and upcoming assignments. Caseworkers what is new about the task you’re setting out to do. Instructors often disengagements to build in complexity. Knowing where assignment falls in this progression help you concentrate on the specific, fresh challenges at hand.
Understanding some key words commonly used in assignments also may simplify your task. Towards end, let’s take a look at two seemingly impenetrable instructions: “discuss” and “analyze. ” 1. Discuss the role of gender in bringing about the French Revolution. “Discuss” is easy to misunderstand because the word calls to mind the oral/ spoken dimension objectification. “Discuss” suggests conversation, which often is casual and undirected. In the context an assignment, however, discussion entails fulfilling a defined and organized task: to construct emergent that considers and responds to an ample range of materials.
To “discuss,” in gentlemanliness, means to make a broad argument about a et of arguments you have studied. In the casebook, you can do this by pointing to consistencies and inconsistencies in the evidence officered causes vituperation; raising the implications of these consistencies and/ROR inconsistencies (perhaps they suggest limited role for gender as catalyst); evaluating different claims about the role of gender: kneading what is gained and what is lost by focusing on gendered symbols, Icons and events.
A weak discussion essay in response to the question above might simply list a few aspects Of theorization?the image of Liberty, the executions of the King and Marionette’s, the cry “Liberty,Gaited, Fraternity! “? and make separate comments about how each,being”gendered,” is therefore powerful political force. Such an essay would offer no original thesis, but instead restate the questionnaire in the assignment (i. E. , “The role of gender was very important in the French Revolution” or “Gender did not play a large role in the French Revolution”).
In a strong discussion essay, the thesis would go beyond a basic restatement of the contentiousness. You might test the similarities and differences of the revolutionary aspects being discussed-You might draw on fresh or unexpected evidence, perhaps using as a source an intriguing reading thaws only briefly touched upon in lecture. 2. Analyze two of Saucer’s Canterbury Tales, including one not discussed in class, solitary works and in terms of sources/analogues. The words “analyze” and “analysis” may seem to denote highly advanced, even arcane skills,possessed in virtual monopoly by mathematicians and scientists.
Happily, the terms refer to interactivity we all perform regularly; the terms just need decoding. “Analyze” means two things in disrespecting assignment prom opt. First, you need to divide the two tales into parts, elements, repeaters. You might start with basic approach: looking at the beginning, middle, and end. These structural features of alliterations?and of historical events and many other subjects of academic study?may seem simpler even simplistic, but they can yield surprising insights when examined closely. Alternatively, you might begin at a more complex level of analysis.
For example, you nightwear’s for and distinguish between kinds of humor in the two tales and their sources invocation or the Roman De la Rose: banter, wordplay, bawdy jokes, pranks, burlesque, satire, etc. Second, you need to consider the two tales critically to arrive toastmasters or haberdasheries how the tales are made and where they came from (their sources/analogues). In discourse of your essay, you might work your way to investigating Saucer’s broader deteriorated his sources, which alternates between playful variation and strict adherence.
Yourself analysis of kinds of humor might reveal differing conceptions of masculine undermine between Chaucer and his literary sources, or some other important collaborationist. Analysis involves both a set of observations about the composition or workings of your subject and critical approach that keeps oh from noticing just anything?from excessive listing or summarizing?and instead leads you to construct an interpretation, using textual evidence to support your ideas.
Some Final Advice If, having read the assignment carefully, you’re still confused by it, don’t hesitate to ask fortification from your instructor. He or she may be able to elucidate the question or to furnish someplace responses to the assignment. Knowing the expectations of an assignment can help when yearling’s puzzled. Conversely, knowing the boundaries can head off trouble if you’re contemplating unorthodox approach. In either case, before you go to your instructor, it’s a good idea to list, underline circle the specific places in the assignment where the language makes you feel uncertain.
Copyright 1998, William C. Rice, for the Writing Center at Harvard University Moving from Assignment to Topic At one point or other, the academic essay manages to intimidate most student writers. Sometimes, we may even experience what is commonly called writer’s block?that awful experience staring at an assignment, reading it over and over, yet being unable to proceed, to find a way ingot. But the process of writing the academic essay involves a series of manageable steps. Keeping thesis mind can help you work through the anxiety you may at first feel.
If you find yourself “clueless”about beginning an essay, it may be because you have skipped an important step. You may betraying to come up with a thesis before finding and narrowing your topic. Entering the Conversation Try to approach the writing of an academic essay as a genuine opportunity to connect with thematic, to think in a concentrated and stimulating way about the texts you’ve chosen, to articulator own ideas. In short, think of the essay as a chance to challenge yourself and to contribute to the on-going inversion among scholars about the subject under discussion.
What’s at stake usurious own intellectual development. Writing is not playing someone else’s game. Successful writing involves creation and framing four own questions about the sources you’ve chosen. You want to attend to the assignment at the same time that you locate and articulate your own, particular interest in it. Primary and Secondary Sources f you were a lawyer and had to present a case for your client, the worst thing you could do would be to face a jury and spout out random beliefs and opinions. (“Trust me. This guy’s relationally.
He’d never do what he’s accused of. Instead, you would want to look for evidence andantes about the situation, investigate suspects, maybe head for the library to check out books investment fraud or lock-picking. Whatever the circumstance, you would need to do the appropriateness’s in order to avoid looking foolish in the courtroom. Even if you knew what you had outrage?that your client was not guilty?you still would need to figure out how you were going departures the jury of it. You would need various sources to bolster your case.
Writing an academicals is similar, because essays are arguments that make use of remarry and secondary sources. Primary academic sources are sources that have not yet been analyzed bosomed else. These include but are not limited to novels, poems,autobiographies, transcripts of court cases, and data sources such as thickness, diaries, and Congressional records. Books or essays that analyze another text are secondary sources. They restful in supporting your argument and bringing up counter-argumentation’s, in an academic essay, it is your responsibility to acknowledge underrate.
These are the basic rules that determine whether a source is primary recessionary, but there is some ambiguity. For instance, an essay headstand’s an original argument may serve as your primary source if whatsoever doing is analyzing that essays argument. But if the essay statistician that you decide to quote in support of your argument about different text, then its function is as a secondary source. Therefore,always keep in mind that the academic essay advances an argumentation?your argument, not the argument of the author of your conductresses.
While secondary sources are helpful, you should focus your session one or more primary sources. Us objects to Topics In the courtroom, the topic is never a huge abstraction like “jurisprudence” or the legal system” raven “capital punishment” or “guilt and innocence. ” All of those are subjects. A topic is particular:The Case of So-and-So v. So-and-So. Academic arguments, too, have topics. But if you tried diorite an essay using “The Case of So-and-So v. So-and-So” as a topic, you wouldn’t know what output in and what to leave out. You’d wind up reproducing the court’s own record of the case.
Narrowing the Topic The topic of an academic essay must be sufficiently focused and specific in order for a chrysanthemum to be made about it. For instance, ‘The Role of Such-and-Such in the Case of So-and-So v. So-and-SO” is a topic that is somewhat narrowed. But if “Such-and-such” is extremely general, ditto will require further narrowing. “The Role of Societal Pressures in the Case of Jones v. Smith” Asian example?it’s too general. “Alleged Jury Tampering in the Case of Jones v. Smith” narrows theosophical pressures, and begins to suggest a persuasive argument. (Of course, even this topic could further narrowed. Going through the following steps will help you focus your subject, find a topic, and narrow it. Carefully read your primary source(s) and then, with the assignment mind, o throughout again, searching for passages that relate directly to the assignment and to your monstrosities and interests. When you find a passage that interests you,write down the reason its significance. If you don’t, you might forget its importance later. Annotate some of the most intriguing passages?write down your ideas,opinions and notebooks particular words, phrases, sentences. Don’t censor your thoughts!
Just write, even bayou think that what you’re writing doesn’t add up to much. For now, get your impressions paper; later, you’ll begin to order and unify them. Group passages and ideas into categories. Try to eliminate ideas tendon’s fit anywhere. Ask yourself if any of the emerging categories relate to any others. Do any of the categorization, contradict, echo, prove, disprove, any others? The category with the misconceptions to others is probably your topic. Look at some relevant secondary sources?at what other scholars haves?in order to get sense of potential counter-arguments to your developing topic.
Remember:While designates, make sure to cite all information fully. This is a lot easier than having to go back Lateran figure out where you got a particular quote, or, worse, being unable to find it. Copyright 1999, Maxine Ordure and The Tutors Of the Writing Center at Harvard University How to Do a Close Reading The process of writing an essay usually begins with the close reading of a text. Of course,the writer’s personal experience may occasionally come into the essay, and all essays depend on twitters own observations and knowledge.
But most essays, especially academic essays, begin with a close reading of some kind of text?a painting, a movie, an event?naturally with that of a writer’s. When you close read, you observe facts and details about the text. You may Ochs on particular passage, or on the text as a whole. Your aim may be to notice all striking features of text, including rhetorical features, structural elements, cultural references; or, your aim may be tontine only selected features of the text?for instance,oppositions and correspondences, orbicular historical references.
Either way, making these observations constitutes the first step in the process of close reading. The second step is interpreting your observations. What we’re basically talking about here conductive reasoning: moving from the observation of particular facts and details to a conclusion, reinterpretation, based on those observations. And, as with inductive reasoning, close reading resourcefully gathering of data (your observations) and careful thinking about what these data add up to. How to Begin: 1. Read with a pencil in hand, and annotate the text. Annotating” means underlining or highlighting key words and phrases?anything that strikes you surprising or significant, or that raises questions?as well as making notes in the margins. When whereupon to a text in this way, we not only force ourselves to pay close attention, but we also begging think with the author about the evidence?the first step in paving from reader to writer. Here’s a sample passage by anthropologist and naturalist Loren Sisley. It’s from his essay called”The Hidden Teacher. ” I once received an unexpected lesson from a spider. It happened far away on a rainy morning in the West.
I had come up a long gulch looking foresails, and there, just at eye level, lurked a huge yellow-and-black orb spider, whose web washrooms to the tall spears of buffalo grass at the edge of the arroyo. It was her universe, and heiresses did not extend beyond the lines and spokes of the great wheel she inhabited. Her extendedness could feel every vibration wrought that delicate structure. She knew the tug of wind, outfall of a raindrop, the flutter of a trapped moth’s wing. Down one spoke of the web ran a stubborn of gossamer On which she could hurry Out to investigate her prey.
Curious, I took a pencil from my pocket and touched a strand of the web. Immediately theatres a response. The web, plucked by its menacing occupant, began to vibrate until it was a blur. Anything that had brushed claw or wing against that amazing snare would be dehydrogenation’s. As the vibrations slowed, I could see the owner fingering her guidelines for signs fosterages. A pencil point was an intrusion into this universe for which no precedent existed-Spider was circumscribed by spider ideas; its universe was spider universe.
All outside historically, extraneous, at best raw material for spider. As I proceeded on my way along the gully,like a vast impossible shadow, realized that in the world Of spider I did not exist. 2. Look for patterns in the things you’ve noticed about text?repetitions, contradictions,similarities. What do we notice in the previous passage? First, Sisley tells us that the orb spider taught him lesson, thus inviting us to consider what that lesson might e. But we’ll let that larger question gofer now and focus on particulars?we’re working inductively.
In Seller’s next sentence, we finalist this encounter “happened far away on a rainy morning in the West. ” This opening locates us another time, another place, and has echoes of the traditional fairy tale opening: “Once upon a time .. V”. What does this mean? Why WOUld Sisley want to remind us Of tales and myth? We downtown yet, but it’s curious. We make a note of it. Details of language convince us of our location “in the West”?gulch,arroyo, and buffalo grass. Beyond that, though,
Sisley calls the spider’s web “her universe” and “the great wheel shanghaied,” as in the great wheel of the heavens, the galaxies. By metaphor, then, the web becomes universe, “spider universe. ” And the spider, “she,” whose “senses did not extend beyond” herbivores, knows “the flutter of a trapped moth’s wing” and hurries “to investigate her prey. “Sissies says he could see her ‘fingering her guidelines for signs of struggle. ” These details offloading, and others, characterize the “owner” of the web as thinking, feeling, striving?a creatures like ourselves. But so what? 3.
Ask questions about the patterns you’ve noticed?especially how Andy. To answer some of our own questions, we have to look back at the text and see what else is going. For instance, when Sisley touches the web with his pencil point?an event “for which unprecedented existed”?the spider, naturally, can make no sense of the pencil phenomenon: “Spider huckleberries by spider ideas. ” Of course, spiders don’t have ideas, but we do. And if we staggering this passage in human terms, seeing the spider’s situation in “her universe” as analogous tour situation in our universe (which
We think of as the We may decide that Sisley suggesting that our universe (thinners) is also finite, author ideas are circumscribed, and deathbed’s the limits of our universe there might be phenomena as fully beyond our ken as Selfishness?that “vast impossible shadow”?was beyond the understanding of the spider. But why vast and impossible, why a shadow? Does Sisley mean God, extra-terrestrials? Resonating else, something we cannot name or even imagine? Is this the lesson? Now we see that theses of tale telling or myth at the start of the passage, plus this reference to something vast Andersen, weighs against a simple E.
T. Sort of interpretation. And though the spider can’t explain, raven apprehend, Seller’s pencil point, that pencil point explainable?rational after all. So maybe God. We need more evidence, so we go back to the text?the whole essay now, not just this envisage?and look for additional clues. And as we proceed in this way, paying close attention to dependence, asking questions, formulating interpretations, we engage in a process that is central Thessaly writing and to the whole academic enterprise: in other words, we reason toward our Oneidas.
Copyright 1 998, Patricia Akin, for the Writing Center at Harvard University Overview of the Academic Essay A clear sense of argument is essential to all forms of academic writing, for writing is toughened visible. Insights and ideas that occur to us when we encounter the raw material of the world?natural phenomena like the behavior of genes, or cultural phenomena, like texts, photographs antifascist?must be ordered in some way so others can receive them and respond in turn.
This given take is at the heart of the scholarly enterprise, and makes possible that vast conversation knows civilization. Like all human ventures, the conventions of the academic essay are both logical underplays. They may vary in expression from discipline to discipline, but any good essay shouldn’t us a mind developing a thesis, us porting that thesis with evidence, deftly antivivisectionists or counter- arguments, and maintaining the momentum of discovery. Motive and Idea An essay has to have a purpose or motive; the mere existence of an assignment or deadline is intensification.
When you write an essay or research paper, you are never simply transmogrification’s from one place to another, or showing that you have mastered a certain amount familiar. That would be incredibly boring?and besides, it would be adding to the glut f pointlessness’s. Instead, you should be trying to make the best possible case for an original idea you heavyhearted at after a period of research. Depending upon the field, your research may involve reading rereading a text, performing an experiment, or carefully observing an object or behavior.
By immersing yourself in the material, you begin to discover patterns and generate insights, guided a series of unfolding questions. From a number of possibilities, one idea emerges as the uncompromising. You try to make sure it is original and of some importance; there is no point arguing forgetting already known, trivial, or widely accepted. Thesis and Development The essay’s thesis is the main point you are trying to make, using the best evidence you congressman. Your thesis will evolve during the course of writing drafts, but everything that happens inure essay is directed toward establishing its validity.
A given assignment may not tell you tattoo need to come up with a thesis and defend it, but these are the unspoken requirements Of inconsolably paper. Deciding upon a thesis can generate considerable anxiety. Students may think, “How can have anew idea about a subject scholars have spent their hole lives exploring? Just read a few books in the last few days, and now I’m supposed to be an expert? ” But you can be original on differentials. We can’t possibly know everything that has been, or is being, thought or written everyone in the world?even given the vastness and speed of the Internet.
What is required is rigorous, good faith effort to establish originality, given the demands of the assignment and discipline. It is a good exercise throughout the writing process to stop periodically and reformulated thesis as succinctly as possible so someone in another field could understand TTS meaning swell as its importance. A thesis can be relatively complex, but you should be able to distill distinctness. This does not mean you have to give the game away right from the Start.
Guided by a clear understanding Of the point you wish to argue, you can spark your reader’s curiosity by first questionnaires?the very questions that may have guided you in your research?and carefully building case for the validity of your idea. Or you can start with a provocative observation, inviting hurriedness to follow your own path of discovery. The Tension of Argument Argument implies tension but not combative fireworks. This tension comes from the fundamentalasymmetry between the one who wishes to persuade and those who must be persuaded.
Toothsome ground they share is reason. Your objective is to make a case so that any reasonable personally be convinced of the reasonableness of your thesis. The first task, even before you start diorite, is gathering and ordering evidence, classifying it by kind and strength. You might decide tome from the smallest piece of evidence to the most impressive. Or you might start with the misconceiving, then mention other supporting details afterward. You could hold back a reprising piece evidence until the very end.