Words: 501
Format The length paper is from minimum 500 to maximum 800 words (bibliography, appendix and foot/end-note if any, are not counted). Use 1. 5 spacing and times roman 12 fonts. Mark clearly your name and student ID number on the paper cover. Please note that plagiarism in any form is a very serious offence and could be subject to disciplinary actions, including being expelled from the University.
For details, please refer to the academic regulations of the University. If you like to use others’ trials, ideas and data to support your argument, remember to address the sources by using proper and consistent way of referencing and citation (PAPA/ Harvard style recommended), meanwhile lecture Powering and resources come from Wisped are not accepted as formal academic sources. Submission ; Penalty The paper shares 40% of the total mark of this course.
You should submit the individual paper to your lecturer with HARDCOPY during the Final Quiz on 2 Deck 2013. Penalty will be incurred for late submissions on course assignments. Late submission for each additional day after the deadline?II marks of the total marks or the course will be deducted for each day; and so forth. Explore the Concept before Start The benchmark of a competent sociology student is not how familiar he is with sociological concepts, theories, and empirical findings, but the ability of sociological imagination.
The sociological imagination is a state of mind with which people recognize that their (and those of others) social conditions, experiences, and ways of understanding the world are placed within larger social, cultural, and political forces. Essentially, the sociological imagination requires that we “look up” and recognize how our lives are subject to and affected by large and powerful forces, and not Just the result of our individual choices and immediate social circles.
Exercising your sociological imagination should make you realize how your individual choices and social circles are actually conditioned by larger social, cultural and political forces. In C. Wright Mills’ own words: “What ordinary men are directly aware of and what they try to do are bounded by the private orbits in which they live; their visions and their powers are limited to the close-up scenes of Job, family, neighborhoods… Neither the fife of an individual nor the history of a society can be understood without Chinese By Hungarian terms of historical change and institutional contradiction.
The well-being they enjoy, they do not usually impute to the big ups and downs of the societies in which they live. Seldom aware of the intricate connection between the patterns of their own lives and the course of world history, ordinary men do not usually know what this connection means for the kinds of men they are becoming and for the kinds of history-making in which they might take part. They do not possess the quality of mind essential to grasp the interplay of man and society, of biography and history, of self and world.