Yearly, different freshman goes to DULLS;M to take the degree course they want to pursue. Upon entering a new school and socializing with different students from different places not Just in the Philippines but from other countries as well, students tend to adapt a new behavior called conformity According to Calling and Goldstein (2004), throughout the decades of investigation of conformity it is apparent that an individual’s inclination and drive to mimic or copy their surroundings is sometimes so swift and unconsciously done as if it was their immediate reflex to respond.
With hose facts stated, the authors found that most students tend to mimic or conform behavior from the new environment they have been Introduced to. The author, McLeod (2007), describes conformity as a type of social Influence that may actually be the foundation for an abrupt change In an Individual’s belief or behavior to enable that person to assimilate with the people that surround them.
Don’t waste your time!
Order your assignment!
On the other hand, conformity, as described by economist is an essential way of (George & Yard, 2010; Beriberi, 1994 as cited in Cabbage & Keystroke, 2011). In addition, conformity is described as an attitude or a behavioral change that happens cause of a real or imagined group pressure (Walker & Hens, 1962; Accord & Beckman, 1964; Brown, 1965; Humans, 1961; Creche, Crucified & Bellyache, 1962; Berg & Bass, 1961; Cash, 1952; Kessler, 1969 as cited in Sangria, 2004).
In contrast to all of this, Robbins (1989, as cited in Sangria, 2004) defines conformity as an act of adjustment into one’s behavior to adhere with the rule of the group. Furthermore, to understand conformity deeper, researchers stated different factors on why students or an individual tend to conform. Safari (2009) states that there are diverse factors which lead students to conform but to give one example, he introduced social interdependence. This is believed to actually be a vital part on how people make individual decisions.
A person’s positive relationship with the people he or she is connected with and the individual’s choice is consistent with either the individual (1) learning from the experience of others and later allows him or her to make a decision, which is also known as social learning, (2) using the individual’s knowledge about a reference group’s decisions and actions to actually compare and ensure his r her decision (social comparison), or (3) actually “going with the flow’ because of influence hence the factor, social influence.
The difference of each factor is significant for these two reasons: it is for the appropriate knowledge and for our hypothetical understanding to use these for our individual choices and for people to differentiate the proper etiquette. Corresponding to Bandier, Frankly, and Ursula (2009) study, they found that if an intermediate norm evolves in the presence of friends in a certain field study where each individual’s payoff only depends on his win actions. Experiments were even conducted to portray how an individual responds to a given situation.
One experiment by Amalgam (1974, as cited in Calling & Goldstein, 2004) includes a stranger who brought middle – aged gentleman as an act of obedience to authority. In contrast to this experiment was Sash’s (1956, as cited in Calling & Goldstein, 2004) famous line Judgment conformity experiments, where he tested conformity by the use of examining the perceptions on the likelihood of an incorrect census compared to a likelihood of an incorrect eye glass prescription.
These two illustrations wanted to describe how influence together with explicit social forces could affect conscious awareness and how it results to conformity. Another factor that causes an individual to conform is compliance. Compliance can be described as an act of corresponding to a given request. Example of this is an explicit charitable campaign or implicit political advertisements who are indirectly asking for votes. Thus, this depicts that the target is being forced to respond the expected way (Calling & Goldstein, 2004).
Moreover, Sloan et. Al. (2006) stated that group norms ere openly influencing self – aggressive behavior. In addition to all of this, there are still various studies that were made to find out reasons on why people conform. The authors, Calling and Goldstein (2004) introduced three motivating factors that they believe is important in the topic of group conformity. First, a person’s choice to conform is based on the desire to act appropriately which therefore results to their reliance with their society.
Second, affiliation goal is what motivates an individual to imitate; this is said because it bases its study on how people think when they want to eased their way of beliefs on how other people perceive them. In addition to this, other reasons stated that individuals usually base their actions to other individual’s choices because they strongly believe that the choice of others is stronger and better that their own choices and beliefs. Another reason why and individual conform is that by simply conforming they feel more belong with their peers (Bannered, 1992; Backhanding et al. 1992 as likewise cited in Safari, 2009). Sometimes, they Just want to avoid the discomfort of being different from others, as found in Solomon Sash’s research and study of conformity. Sometimes, they Just want to avoid the discomfort of being different from others, as found in Solomon Sash’s research and study of conformity. Other reasons why an individual conform is the fear of social sanction if they were to be deviated from the social norm, adhering to Munson and Magma (2006).
Thus, it can be concluded that individuals conform because acceptance by one’s group is often contingent to established norms. However, considering the given factors and reasons based on the previous studies and research on why and how an individual conforms, the researcher assumes and concluded it to be limited and that here might be still other factors on why an individual conform. In addition to that, the previous study limits its samples to those who interacted with social groups only in different institutions such as school, offices, etc. But didn’t consider those who are homesteaded.
According to Lynn (2010), home education families and promoters have been critiqued due to the account that they are said to be straying children away from the ‘real world’ and patching up that lack with other knowledge. Aside from that, the author also stated in the study entitled, Home Education, Conformity, ND the Real World Dilemma, that there are some isolated cases where a formerly home educated kid is plunked into a government school setting and struggles to conform. Because of this reason, the researchers decided to conduct a further study with the DULLS-M ID 114 Students as the sample.
The researchers’ aims to find what are the different factors and reasons the students go through that may actually cause an individual to conform. Considering that these students are in a new environment, the researchers are interested in locating the different ways these students conform to the Alsatian culture. DULLS-M, on an annual basis, takes in about 4,500 students from different walks of life, meaning; the people that inhabit the halls of this university all come from different backgrounds, different cultures, different personalities, and several other unique characteristics.
But what happens when this university takes in a new group of people into this space? Without a doubt, these new students will feel off about the things that now surround them. Students tend to most likely conform to their perceptions of their new classmates’ behavior that might possibly affect them to change their beliefs, as stated in Dunce’s (2005) study. Some studies prove that through observation students tend to have a desire in conforming. As stated in Cutler and Glasses (2010), that through observation students tends to have a desire in conforming.
Like for example, by simply observing a friend or a college roommate using Marijuana, it might trigger him/her to imitate or conform what he/she had observed. Also, it is also evident that as the years go by, more and more students will continue to enter the university; therefore they will grow accustomed to the culture. Conform but also to use different theories in social psychology to establish the reducibility of the research study. Research Problems The study proposed and answered the following research questions.