Words: 1248
States was Influenced from his great loss of wealth In the Panic of 1795, Wall Street’s first financial crisis, when stocks’ value depreciated rapidly. Jackson despised Indians from previous military encounters, influencing his decision to remove the Indians from eastern territory. His opposition to the states’ rights to nullify or state that a federal law was unconstitutional was a contradiction to the Jackson Democracy. It values states having more voice than the federal government his personal affairs once again playing a role by swaying him to want to defeat his old vice-president
John C. Calhoun who betrayed him in the matter. Jackson’s conduct involving these issues was not on the behalf of the common man, his controversial decisions were closely intertwined with his own personal opinions and experiences. Jackson brought his rural background to office, portraying himself as the friend to the “common man. ” As a child, he grew up in rural Carolina territory with a single mother. With only a preemptively education, he swayed the polls of the 1828 Presidential Election In his favor, by his mastering of “the liberal rhetoric to speak for the common man. Promptly after becoming the President of the united States, he broke many traditions, including hosting an elegant reception and opening the White House to the public. The riotous affair upset many of the upper class of America. It was meant to send a clear sign to the American public, that Jackson was a “man of the people. “2 Jackson’s political views were not plainly stated, but he “enjoyed widespread support that ranged across all classes and sections of the country… All this without Jackson being clearly pro- or annotator, pro- or intenseness, pro- or antinovel, middle or upper class. His personal experiences and past affected many of his decision in political matters. The recharging of the United States National Bank was brought to Senate two years prior to It scheduled re-petition, acting as a confrontation to Jackson’s controversial opposition of the bank. The challenging of his power was brought to Senate from Senators Henry Clay and Daniel Webster before Jackson’s potential re- election. The Senators’ hoped to divide the political parties distinctly before the election, making Jackson would look weak to the general public and his opponents.
If Jackson opposed it, he could potentially create many opponents. Jackson was “deeply impressed with the belief that some of the powers and privileges possessed by the existing bank are unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive of the rights of the States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people. “4 The National Bank did not nave ten concerns AT ten states at nana; many AT ten states Interests sprouted Trot the common man of the region. Jackson took the upper hand in the matter, taking a firm stance in vetoing the recharge.
Personal memories from the past may have been laded too close to Jackson’s chest, as his hatred of the banks may have stemmed from when he was a young man. Just as he had begun to be increasingly successful, he lost most of his wealth in the Panic of 1795; the first financial crisis arising from the National Bank inflating the worth American money to attempt to overcome debts. Jackson blamed the bank for his lost wealth, his memories being resentful and his attitude bitter. Awhile he claimed to be speaking for the common man, his embittered memories wanting to have revenge on the bank that he believed took everything from him.
There was no pity for the Native Americans from Andrew Jackson during the era of Indian Removal, the systematic expulsion of Native Americans from settled American territories. Jackson’s personal history played an exceptional role in his view of the removals, especially towards the Native Americans in South-Eastern territories the Seminole, Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaws and Choctaw. His past included his fiery fighting against them as a young man in 1788, and suppressing their attacks in 1818. When he was dispatched in 1818 to quell the raids of the Creek and Seminole
Indians, “instead of Just halting the raids, Jackson pursued the Indians to the villages… Captured Pensacola, disposed the Spanish governor, and hanged two British citizens blamed for encouraging Indian attacks. “5 His hatred for the Indians was a pure form of abhorrence, leading him to remove them to the utmost of his ability. The Trail of Tears, initiated by the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was the involuntary relocation of many Southeastern Indian nations. It resulted in thousands perishing from the cruel conditions and the loss of spirit of many Native Americans. In 1832, when the U. S.
Supreme Court had ruled that Georgia “had to its treaties with the Cherokee,” Jackson did not hesitate to support Georgians right to the deal with the Cherokee without Federal interference. Jackson reputedly said, “[Chief Justice] John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it. “6 Jackson’s decision to ignore the ruling showed his lack of understanding in different cultures, making his relation to the ordinary white male more apparent of being a fallacy. Although his actions could be viewed as saving the territory for the common man, he was pandering to the en in a brutal act of ethnic cleansing.
The voice of the ordinary men of the South were not heard; the Nullification Crisis was sparked by South Carolina’s Ordinance of Nullification (1832), that stated that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional, intern refusing to accept them, making it void within South Carolina. Jackson’s personal affairs played a large role in the Nullification Crisis, as his vice president, John C. Calhoun resigned from office so he could run for Senate and defend his state’s (South Carolina) right of nullification.
Jackson saw this as a challenge of power from Calhoun, to create a political debacle for Jackson. Jackson addressed the people of the South Carolina with his Nullification Proclamation, saying that they were “in direct violation of their duty as citizens of the United States” and “subversive of its Constitution. “7 Although he believed in the states’ rights, he enforced the role of the federal government to demonstrate his power to John C. Calhoun, and also to gain support from northerners. “Jackson enamels acted contrary to precepts AT Jackson democracy, In reticular regarding the theory of states’ rights.
Jackson’s were ardent defenders to the notion of limited government and that most government function should be left to the authority of the government. “8 Jackson went against his own beliefs (of state rights) purely to win the challenge against Calhoun, enacting the Force Bill, letting the federal government use military force to enforce laws of Congress. His ultimate decision of federal supremacy showed that he did not act on the behalf of the common man; the state being where the voice of the common man is best eared.
Andrew Jackson was elected President of the United States based upon his claim to be a man of democracy and a champion of the common man. Yet, his actions as president spoke louder than his words, his other motivations altering the way he presided over the nation. His self-portrait of the common man was a fallacy, his personal motivations and interests that influenced his actions, were often contradictory. As President, Andrew Jackson did not act on the behalf of the “common man,” his controversial decisions were often acted upon by his personal motives.