This could achieve enhanced policy outcomes for the Australian community and provide a system of government that “delivers the Australian people the opportunities they deserve” (Brume 2008). David Black (1998) describes federalism as ‘the process by which the Commonwealth of Australia was formed on 1 January 1901 , was unusual then, and still is”. The federal system has provided a relatively stable cooperative form of government, however, changing demographics, global pressures and fiscal situations within government have meant that the yester is now seen as being in a malaise and in need of repair (Want 2007).
The modernization and globalization of markets, media and communication has eroded regional identities in Australia. In the past the Australian states were protected from a centralized form of federalism but as modern technology reduced the physical distance institutional barriers were decreased. These global pressures mean that Australian states risk becoming agent providers for a central government (Want 2007: page). Increased activity has resulted in hyper-interaction involving all three levels of government.
Don’t waste your time!
Order your assignment!
Additionally, lack of cultural regions in Australia unlike most other federations meant lack of regionally based governance system (Want 2007: 276). Australia retains a highly centralized fiscal system, holds a high amount of concurrent powers across all levels of government and lacks institutional barriers that prevent a centralized system. Fiscal imbalance between states and the Commonwealth impacts directly at a regional level even though policies are driven nationally.
Concurrent Commonwealth-State powers also impact at regional level due to lack of adequate attention given to real impacts while decisions are made at federal level. The reduced effectiveness of federalism has contributed towards these issues and has failed to keep pace with modern times. It is now in need of repair to make it more efficient and capable of providing support to the modern Australian public. Current federal arrangements are holding back necessary micro-economic reform while there is a continuous struggle to respond to global economic forces. (Podgier 2008).
Although federalism can work it is not performing at the level expected. Participants at the Roundtable agreed that the process of reform can improve federalism but needs a different policy approach. Individual agreements on shared responsibilities will be needed to reshape policy areas. Increased cooperation and collaboration around national and state issues would need to be achieved. Participants started by looking at improving the generic architecture by enhancing the primary cooperation of levels of government through the Council of Australian Governments (COCA).
This could be the platform for any further detailed reform in order to avoid policy making failures around shared responsibility between governments. It is also important to note that the attendees agreed reform would need to start from the current position and not echoing any previous attempts. The Australian federal system is characterized by a significant level of vertical fiscal imbalance and this issue would need to be addressed to assist in reforming federalism.
The Commonwealth holds the monopoly on tax revenue from income and SST and much of this is paid back to the states by way of Specific Purpose Payments (Sips). These Sips allow the Commonwealth to grant funds to states with conditions in areas that are institutionally the states’ domain. As Sips make up 40 % of Commonwealth grants the streamlining of these with a focus on outcomes would allow increased efficiency. In addition, guaranteed revenue would allow states to fund their responsibilities without central pressures.
Whilst this imbalance could be reduced by assigning state expenditure responsibilities to the Commonwealth, it is an unrealistic expectation to reduce such a significant imbalance. (Carling, 2008: page’s) Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for the different levels of overeaten is essential, as Carling (2008: page) states, “A federal system needs to be firmly anchored to a rational allocation of roles and responsibilities for the different levels of government” Lack of clearly defined roles can cause duplication of processes and conflict in policy making, giving states the opportunity to avoid accountability.
A review of roles and responsibilities is a logical starting point, with the functional roles of Commonwealth and the state’ clearly defined. This may require that the Commonwealth takes a leadership role to ensure states are able to effectively liver services. It is important to understand that the distribution Of responsibilities between the levels Government has evolved aver time, and will presumably continue to change as policy and political imperatives require. Podgier 2008) Collaboration between governments to deliver long term sustainable national solutions is needed to face the significant social, economic and environmental challenges. Recently, all three levels of government have become receptive towards the idea of cooperative federalism. For effective federation architecture of cooperation consisting components such as reminisces to guide, supporting legal and institutional arrangements and appropriate cultural practices and attitudes are required.
Focus could be on formalization of COCA through intergovernmental agreement, clarification of COCA and ministerial council relation, ongoing review of federal financial relations and development of cultural practices to support the best of federalism. The change offers opportunities to make lasting improvements and Australian governments should seize the opportunity towards delivering effective national responses and generating substantial benefits for Australians.