Words: 512
The writer has found a topic she wants to write about related to gender colonization, but has not articulated her purpose or what she wants to say about it. Even the topic is unclear. There may be several topics related to gender colonization, but no apparent connection between them. The writing appears to be a ferrite, not a finished blob. The blob does not meet minimum requirements for assignment or engages in acts of plagiarism, or the blob does not address the topic of gender colonization at all. DEVELOPMENT The main point is thoroughly developed.
The writer reflects the questions raised by her stories and memories with thoughtful analysis. The main point is fairly well developed, but some key questions are omitted. Some development, but certain supporting points are not clearly relevant to the main point. There may be apparent digressions, contradictions or repetition for no clear reason. Inadequate development Of ideas with few or weak supporting points; little to no analysis. ARRANGEMENT “Seems to flow naturally” because of extremely effective use of arrangement strategies; arrangement patterns support the purpose of the writing.
Uses more than one arrangement strategy to create interest. Writer is aware of the arrangement strategies she uses, and explains her hoicks in the RAIDS analysis. Effective use of arrangement strategies; arrangement strategies do not inhibit the purpose. Arrangement strategies could be more appropriate and/or more effective at supporting the purpose of the writing. Lacks clear or appropriate arrangement strategies; arrangement detracts from papers purpose. AUDIENCE Tone appropriate for audience of first-year students interested in women’s rights and gender studies.
Audience would be strongly attracted by the theme and can easily understand each part of the writing. Understandable and interesting for both audiences (classmates and instructor). Tone appropriate for writing situation and audience; establishes a connection with audience interests. Most relates to audience interest but some of it’s off. Tone is sometimes but not always audience appropriate; connections with audience interests are weak. Difficult to tell who the audience is; switches throughout writing.
Uses inappropriate tone for the writing situation; lacks audience awareness. No particular audience apparent. No idea who the audience is, in either the blob or the RAIDS analysis. LANGUAGE Varied language structures engage the reader. Writing style is appropriate for a blob with an audience of educated readers. All spelling and grammar corrections noted by Word or Google are made. All homophone errors are corrected. Difficult or unknown vocabulary and references are explained, possibly with hyperlinks.
Illustrates more than minimum facility with language; engages the reader. Writing style is generally appropriate for a blob with an audience of educated readers. Nearly all spelling and grammar corrections noted by Word or Google are made. Nearly all homophone errors are corrected. Most difficult or unknown vocabulary and references are explained, possibly with hyperlinks. Illustrates a basic facility with language; some significant sentence-level robbers. Writing style is sometimes or partially appropriate for a blob with an audience of educated readers.