An Analysis of My Personality Type Assignment

An Analysis of My Personality Type Assignment Words: 1502

Your main points and each step are clear but you did not label them correctly. Good observations, points and outcomes documented throughout the paper. Conclusions/Summary References/Citations (4) Good job/ Citations throughout each section Spelling/Grammar Good job/ Be sure to use active voice page Count/l_MIT (4) 20 PAP Format/Errors See PAP comments throughout the paper Overall Comments: Very Good paper! This paper has demonstrated that you understand the core objectives and learning outcomes for this assignment and the meaning of your personal assessment.

Remember that graduate level writing is a continuous improvement process. A solid best practice is writing a paper and then putting it down and reading it when you are fresh. You will often pick up small mistakes by doing this. Fix some of the little mistakes found in this paper and you will strengthen your work on future assignments. It is evident you paid attention to getting your paper right… You are doing graduate level writing. Enjoyed reading your work … Great job! This paper discusses my personal results of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test.

Don’t waste your time!
Order your assignment!

order now

It also details how analyzing and understanding personality types is relevant to organizational behavior. The first section of this paper details and discusses the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. Each specific personality preference is analyzed and validated based on my type and temperament. Examples from my personal and professional life are utilized during the validation. The second section off this paper addresses what have learned about the Myers-Briggs and Jung Typology personality tests and how this knowledge can be used by an employee, co-worker, and manager of an organization .

Seem,’rods: personality, type, organizational behavior Richard Nixon once said, “Don’t try to take on a new personality; it doesn’t work” (“Quotes on Personality’, 2014). Believe that this is excellent advice. Instead of trying to develop a new personality, perhaps people should learn to better understand the personality that they have. After taking the Myers- Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I have a better understanding of my own personality and also the personality traits of other people around me.

In the first section of this paper I will detail and discuss the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. In the second section of this paper I will explain how what I learned about personality types relates to organizational behavior and how it will help me be a better employee, co-worker, and manager. Aspects of My Personality Type After taking both the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I was classified with the Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging (1ST J) personality type.

SITS personality types are considered quiet reserved people who are loyal, faithful, and dependable (“Psychological Type”, 2014). They tend to express a strong sense of duty and commitment and are recently very serious individuals (“Jung Typology Test”, 2014). Gist’s believe in laws and traditions and they are generally conservative in nature (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In the following paragraphs will discuss the validity of the different letters of my personality type and how they specifically relate to me.

Introvert Preference On the Jung Typology Test, I scored a distinct preference of 67% introversion over extroversion. As an introvert, I tend to focus within myself for satisfaction. Frequently I have to force myself to interact with people in a social setting. I rarely enjoy hanging out in large groups of people. I prefer to spend time alone and would consider myself a “home body’. When I do go out, it is usually to a place where I don’t have to interact with people on a personal level.

Sitting in a dark movie theatre with my family or eating dinner at a restaurant are perfect examples of a low threat social setting. Throughout my life I have always had 1 or 2 deep friendships as opposed to a large group of friends. An occasional weakness with introverts is they are sometimes reel octant to work with others (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In my professional life, I am not quite as introverted. As a military member and manager of people, I have to interact with my subordinates and peers on a daily basis in order to facilitate mission accomplishment.

Sensing Preference With a sensing presence of 62%, according to the Jung Typology Test, I seem to conform to approximately 70% of the U. S. Population regarding this preference (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). Sensors are defined as individuals that prefer to get their information in a literal way from their 5 senses as opposed to getting information in a figurative way like an intuitive arson would (“Psychological Type”, 2014). In both my personal and professional life prefer to deal in facts and live by a set of rules. As a 25 year military veteran, have been conditioned to respond and react exactly this way.

I tend to rely on my experiences to help me analyze the specifics as they are presented to me. A major weakness with my preference for sensing is that sometimes refuse to look at things from another perspective. Thinking In this measured area of the Jung Typology Test, I demonstrated a clear propensity for the thinking preference with a rating of 88%. As a manager in he military profession, pride myself on my ability to be objective, fair and firm. As a supervisor I frequently make difficult decisions and firmly believe that it is more important to be respected than liked. Always try to look at things from a logical perspective and try not to let my personal feelings get in the way of my decisions. One down side with the thinking preference is that it is possible to forget about the people perspective when you are making decisions (“Psychological Type”, 2014). Judging Preference The judging preference was my most definitive personality preference with rating of 100% on the Jung Typology Test. In my military profession I live by a schedule, make decisive judgments, and always try to follow the established rules and regulations. Onto like to wait until the last minute to do things. I am also very conservative and regulated in my approach to my personal and professional life. One weakness of my overwhelmingly strong judging preference is that frequently have little patience with people that are procrastinators, poor planners, or unable to make decisions. SITS Personality with a SO Temperament People with SITS personalities are considered internally focused individuals ho exhibit; strong senses of duty, good organizational skills, are driven to succeed, are honest, and value their integrity (“Psychological Type”, 2014).

My temperament is a Sensing Judging (SO). SO temperaments desire to be associated with significant institutions or organizations (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). As a Non-commissioned Officer in the united States Air Force this makes perfect sense. I enjoy the daily challenges associated with being an administrator and manager. I have a deep respect for the chain of command within my organization, and pride myself on being reliable. A active byproduct is that in my personal life my SO temperament can sometimes be overwhelming for my children because I tend to be a task master.

Relating Personality Types to Organizations After reading Type Talk at Work, I have a greater knowledge of the 16 different personality types and how they relate to organizational behavior. As a manager in an organization, it is essential that I am able to calculate the internal strengths and weaknesses of my employees (Fisher, 2012). Understanding how to analyze an individual based on their personality type can be of enormous benefit to me as a supervisor. Throughout my years as an enlisted manager in the IIS Air Force, I have learned that each individual is different and you have to manage them accordingly.

For example; if I have to assign someone as training instructor, probably would look for an extrovert over an introvert. Since having someone who is comfortable speaking in front of people would be vital for this position, an extrovert personality would be a better choice. Motivation is also different based on personality. Extroverts enjoy being rewarded in public, while introverts might prefer a more low key setting. As a manager it is also important for me to understand how my own personality type effects my management style.

As a SITS personality type, occasionally have a tendency to dismiss the perspectives of others. I also am a very “by the book” manager. Understanding the weaker characteristics of my personality type will help me to control them so they don’t corrupt my ability to manage my organization (“Psychological Type”, 2014). Reading and learning about the 16 different personality types has been very enlightening from a personal and professional perspective. Understanding he four different personality preferences and how they work together to make up my personality will benefit me throughout my life.

How to cite this assignment

Choose cite format:
An Analysis of My Personality Type Assignment. (2019, Oct 19). Retrieved September 17, 2021, from