I would describe Evelyn Gustafson leadership style is Charismatic , she has the ability to inspire and motivate people to do more than they normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. She creates an atmosphere of change, and she drives her subordinates to work hard. Her behavior is supportive, she shows concerns for her subordinates by providing flexible scheduling, and giving them frequent breaks, and provided training. Its strengths included Gustafson could motivate her employees to meet the Laos, mean more production can be done, and less time frustrated over the job.
Weaknesses are she might not be well to deal with the company problem such as efficiency , a charismatic leader tends to believe more in him- or herself than in their team. This can create a risk that a project, or even an entire organization, might collapse if the leader were to leave In addition she shows signs of empathy which is the capacity to recognize or understand another’s state of mind or emotion. It is often characterized as the ability to “put oneself into another’s shoes”, or to in some way experience the outlook or emotions of another being within oneself.
Don’t waste your time!
Order your assignment!
Her sources of influence were the fact that she use to be a customer service representative and she knows how it feels to deal with the low wages and the disgruntle employees. 2. Erik Rasmussen may have adopted the Directed leadership-he tells his subordinates exactly what to do. His behavior includes setting performance goals , for instance he increased the number of calls per hour each preventative have , he made schedules, for example in the text ” scheduling was the goal for him’.
He can also be described as being task-oriented, which he can become be very autocratic. He or she will actively define the work and the roles required, put structures in place, plan, organize and monitor. However, as task-oriented leaders spare little thought for the well being of their teams, this approach can suffer many of the flaws of autocratic leadership, with difficulties in motivating and retaining staff. His source of influence is the fact that this was his first management position, and he has no room for failure. . 1 were Martin Quinn I would suggest that Erie’s leadership style be adopted into a more situational type leadership-whereby the style of leadership style differs according to what situation or work, which they are faced with. If Erick had remained with his leadership style he would have to improve on his effectiveness.. Effective leaders generate higher productivity, lower costs, and more opportunities than ineffective leaders.
Effective leaders create results, attain goal, realize vision, and other objectives more quickly and at a higher level of quality than ineffective leaders. Think that Mr.. Rasmussen could change his leadership style with the help of top management and development in his career. He is a young man with a lot of opportunities for new experiences, he should embrace new ways of leadership, the ‘textbook’ way of leadership might not be effective, persons with years of experience can help him along the way.