Words: 1236
Before the new policy, white males with land were able to vote. However most Of the wealthy landowners who could Vote did not vote. With Andrew Jackson’s new policy, both poor whites and wealthy whites were able to vote. Most of the states changed their presidential electors to be elected by the people from 1816 to 1 836 (Doc. A). Andrew Jackson was democratic in his intentions of being a common man, however a plethora of his actions made allows historians to argue that he is undemocratic.
His removal of Indians, removal of the second bank of the United States, and his political policies such as the rotation of offices and the Spoils system made him a man of many inspiration words with diverse actions. Andrew Jackson was the “common man” among his white citizens. Their words were more imperative than the words of the minorities. When Citizens wanted to be safe from the minorities and move their businesses to the Indian land by mining the Indian land for rich minerals such as gold and iron, Andrew Jackson wanted to supply their demand by instituting a new act named the Indian Removal Act.
Andrew Jackson knew that the Indians were veiled people who wanted to become farmers, similar to the Americans. Sequoia was living proof of the non-savage Indian Community. With influence from American culture and literature, Sequoia developed a writing system which consisted of 86 spoken Cherokee symbols (Textbook peg. 244). The Cherokee language was used to share ideas, communicate through written and spoken language, and to keep a safe written history of events.
However, though the Cherokees made an attempt to become a civilized communion??y’ similar to the American community, Andrew Jackson wanted to keep his remises as the “common man” and do what the people wanted from him. Before Andrew Jackson could imply this act, he needed to become allies with the community of the Indians, by stating that if they emigrate towards the west, the Indians will have control over the land however “This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves Of their fathers and seek a home in a distant land (Doc.
J). Many Indians believe that Andrew Jackson’s Promise. “As long as grass grows and water runs… , [the land] will be yours forever. Was absurd and unreliable. They pleaded with the white man, writing letters to them, stating that the land unknown to them, scarce of food and water, and the people on the land would not be capable of communicating with them, as they will speak a different language from their own (Doc. K). In the end, Andrew Jackson has made his final decision to force the Indians through the trail of tears.
Andrew Jackson did not want to see the Indians suffer; instead he wanted to listen and apply what the people’s demands were, even if it included exiling the Indians from their homeland. On the topic of the peoples demands, the second of bank of the Lignite States was one of the imperative issues for the citizens of the United States during Jackson’s democracy. The second bank of the United States was a great support of the economy. It had provided loans for starting new businesses and paying for goods that people did not have the money for.
The bank prospered from the government’s tax revenue. Many farmers and poor people could barely afford to pay taxes and wanted Jackson to get rid of the second bank of the United States. As the leader of the “common man” Jackson loud willingly remove the bank of the United States; however Henry clay has offered to researcher the bank of the United States. Jackson disapproves Henry clay’s ban researcher as the bank “enjoys an exclusive privilege of banking,… Almost a monopoly of the foreign and domestic exchange” (Doc. F).
The bank was primary managed by the wealthy citizens of the America, and as the national representative of the common man Jackson was cognizant of being competent to know what the selfish goal of the second bank of the United States according to the wealthy class. Jackson states “it is to be regretted that he rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes” (Doc. F). With Jackson’s bank veto, Wealthy citizens challenged his decision by marking it as undemocratic, Daniel Webster states “it seeks to inflame the poor against the rich” (Doc. G).
More wealthy people with above and beyond to challenge Jackson by creating a propagandist picture in order to persuade others that]Jackson just wanted to become a Monarch who crushed the constitution under his feet (Doc. E). Nevertheless, Jackson was seemly supplying the citizen’s demand of removing the bank of the United States, in process he was also “undemocratic” to the small percentage of rich people in America. As the bank was a significant issue in the era of Jackson’s democracy, Jackson’s intentions and actions in political and government affairs and issues was ironic to his “common man” structure.
Jackson believed that the office holders in congress were run by the wealthy. The wealthy would only support themselves for their own benefit, which was a hindrance to Jackson’s common man mentality. Andrew Jackson intended that all offices “whether appointed or elected must ultimately fall under the absolute control Of the people” by switching the offices every four years and filling in the spots with the people (Doc. D). However Jackson contradicted himself by seldom changing the office. Jackson also wanted the president to “serve a single term of no more than four or six years… Which would allow other common man to become president (Doc. D). Yet again, Jackson becomes a hypocrite by serving two terms in office, stating that the people wanted him to continue his legacy as a president. Jackson’s intentions would have been very beneficial towards the people if he had actually instituted his own democratic policies. In Conclusions, Jackson’s democratic intentions and plans for the white citizens of the United States were vital towards his “Common Man” reputation, other the other hand, Jackson was a hypocrite for his actual actions.
The Indian removal act had given Jackson a reason in a conscious to remove the Indians from their father’s land in order allow his citizens to take Indian land to acquire gold, iron, and other rich minerals within the land, which would cause citizens to perverse more space for a better and productive life. The removal of the bank was an improvement towards the economy of the common man by saying “good riddance” to the wealthy bank owners whom provided loans to people.
Jackson’s plans for the rotation of offices and change of presidency after four years was great contributions towards democracy, however his lack of appliance for these policies made him a hypocrite. Though Jackson was for actions, imagine who would be president now if it wasn’t for the common man? Barack Obama was not a rich snob, and he was similar to the average Joe who lived to poverty, so thank Andrew Jackson the common man, for allowing us to have another president who is similar to the “common man. ”