The high treatment of earthlier will have more significant of a change in bacterial growth than the control and low treatment. As a class we took a long and winding Journey down to the American River where we took samples of the water. Each group then put this water into three separate Jars. Euglena is a genus of unicellular flagellate protests. It is the best known and most widely studied member of the phylum Euglena (Race 2010). We then put Euglena inside of each of the three Jars. This species can be used to study cell growth and metabolism in various environmental conditions (Euglena 013).
Groups then chose a treatment for the bacteria ridden water; we chose fertilizer as our treatment group. A control Jar, low treatment Jar, and high treatment jar were then all chosen. The control Jar contained no treatment, the low treatment jar contained little amount of treatment, and the high treatment contained a higher amount of fertilizer. Studies show that pond fertilization is microbiological more dynamic in the earlier phases Can 2001). Due to the fact that this lab is only a three week process we saw all of the earlier phases of the fertilization working.
Don’t waste your time!
Order your assignment!
Once a week during our lab class for three weeks, we would take a sample of each Jar and measure the Euglena contained within the water. From these samples we would get the number of Euglena, Rotifer’s, other Authors, and also other Heterogeneous that were present. We would then record the results into our lab manuals and enter them into excel. We compared the bacterial growth in all three Jars in order to find out our hypothesis. Figure 1 Euglena was the most important data group out of all the data that was collected in these three weeks.
As showed in figure one and two, the control group had an increase in Euglena count from week two to week three, the high and low treatment group both had a small decrease in Euglena count. This shows that fertilizer will have an effect on the environment no matter the amount. Therefore our hypothesis was supported and the high treatment of fertilizer did have a more significant change in bacteria then both the control and the low treatments. Due to the fact the high treatment had a higher dosage of fertilization it decreased the Euglena count more than the low and control treatments did.
All in all, the growth in the bacteria has proven to be decreased by the presence of fertilizer. Now we know that Euglena River Ecology Report By groveled fertilizer and become less abundant. Our alternative hypothesis saying that the high and low treatment would have the same amount of change was wrong, but our null hypothesis that stated the high treatment of fertilizer will have a more significant change than that of the low and control treatment was supported. Works Cited -Becker, C. Dale, and D. A. Neither. Water Quality in North American River Systems.