Words: 696
Civil disobedience is such a man-made laws and regulations that may be defective and the defect to resolve legal and institutional laws and regulations when there is no ay to create a new system by the idea that disobedience means. The logic of democracy, civil disobedience is never a finished product, not current, is the assumption that in the process of forming. So our society and social phenomena Of the Korea Democracy Is Not When evaluating assessment dichotomy rather than ‘how much’ is the question of democracy would make sense to throw.
Unjust and evil system under democratic law can be enacted, fragmented and human rights law enforcement is because there may be. Legal action against illegal to take corresponding measures the degree of democracy is certain immanent. But too much time to respond to gal and contain costs, normal citizens can not withstand the reality of illegal degree may lead to. When this happens to awaken silent and indifferent fellow citizens to change the phenomenon ‘unlawful means’ justifiable belief will choose. Exist as a human being with free will, the freedom to disobey no choice button be recognized as a part of.
Outside the authority of freedom of obedience’, but if allowed, it is already the practice of human freedom as autonomous from the inside out is because there is no way to build a place name. The extinction of the human race hatred and greed, destructive behavior arises as result of the submission of the individual and, through the exercise of will to disobey don’t prevent the destruction of the progress that can be achieved Erich From said. Civil disobedience is a personal decision and practice, minorities, abbreviations is also an effective way to announce their claims. Democracy, majority rule is applied.
All citizens of the majority rule to never not bring satisfactory results, but rather in the direction of a small number of human rights violations to abuse, the handful of non-violent methods of non-violent civil disobedience action to reveal the injustice of it can. Even though Emerson early on saw in Thoreau the makings of a great American poet, Thoreau is mostly remembered as an environmentalist and civil rights advocate. When we consider the fact that the term environment was not even heard Of in Thoreau s lifetime, we realize the depth and width of Thoreau ; s vision.
In this respect Thoreau was not a run-of-the mill poet. The fact that his major ideas have been picked up by many leaders in different countries in the 20th century long after his death indicates the importance and relevance of his ideas even today. His two main ideas can be summed up as follows: the interconnectedness of man and his surroundings and the danger of America s expansionist ambition exhibited in the Mexican War(1846-1 848). In this regard Walden and Civil Disobedience deserve our close attention.
Walden is a product of Thoreau ;s experiment with “Simple Living” on the shore of Walden Pond in Concord, MA, from 1845 to 1847. It is also his prose poem in that Walden is not a collection of chronological records of his life during that period, but an edited and polished version of a literary work. In Walden Thoreau reflects on the power as well as tyranny of nature in his seclusion from civilization. By doing so he urges us to value frugal and simple life face to face with nature. Civil Disobedience, on the other hand, seems to be different from Walden at first sight.
This initial reaction on our part is erroneous. Civil Disobedience can be considered as a concrete guideline to Simple Living. By maintaining that “the least government is the best government,” Thoreau shows how an ideal government can promote individual rights and freedom. A parallel may be drawn between the communicative aspect of civil disobedience and the communicative aspect of lawful punishment by the state. In punishing an offender, the state seeks to enunciate both its condemnation of the crime committed and its desire for repentance and reformation on the part of the offender.