Words: 582
Unit 36 – M1 Name: T*** ****Class: 2B2 Teacher: Mr. ******* M1 Grading grid Analyse the standard of working conditions provided by a selected manufacturer and a service provider. Introduction In this assignment I need to analyse the standard of working conditions provided by a selected manufacturer and a service provider, In other words I have to compare all the working conditions, for example comparing the Fire precautions in the workplace or how the electricity is different.
I’m doing this by using a “walk-through”. Companies: BCP packaging Helios Bloemenexport BV Standard of working conditions at BCP packaging Physical environment there is a Sprinkler system but Its not working. A very dangerous thing that was exposed were the electricity cables, these cabled were all in the open and that is a really serious case a case of health and safety. But there is another problem, BCP is missing parts on the steam pipes, that means that the steam pipes are unprotected, and in some cases can be dangerous. Equipment
At BCP packaging in case of fire everyone needs to evacuate by a fire exit, But in the case of BCP this was not correctly, most of the emergency fire exits were locked, and when you try to find a emergency exit it almost impossible because there was a total lack of evacuation procedures. Standard of working conditions in my selected company, Helios Bloemenexport BV Description of Physical environment Helios Bloemenveiling bv, Is working in the flower selling branch, When I was there I didn’t noticed any important irregularities Only that the Tables have sharp edges and the working environment I clearly too old.
Also the Electric cables were nicely moved away but only some of the cables were right in the Open above you. Also the steam pipes were nicely removed, and when I did see one, I’d bet it wasn’t open in any kind Equipments only seen two fire extinguisher were located. In the cafeteria there weren’t any fire sprinklers, above the cafeteria there is a fire extinguisher that was placed there in case of fire. Helios owns a lot of dangerous machines. But when i got a map with all the precautions if there was a fire i was buffed.
Helios is good trained with preventing a fire, the whole building is specially checked every year to prevent a fire from happening. Comparing the companies – BCP / Helios • BCP Does have a sprinkler system in case of fire but It’s not working – Helios Doest have a sprinkler system • BCP leaves all the electricity cables out in the open which is dangerous – At Helios most of these dangerous cables are moved away or locked • BCP is having trouble with the open steam pipes – Helios is not working with 2 maybe but these are full protected. BOTH companies are applies with a evacuation plan but, At BCP there was a lack of evacuation plans AND the fire emergency doors were locked, at Helios this is not in the picture So in this case Helios is more aware with the health and safety of their employees, BPC can learn a lot from Helios. These issues which BCP has were not unnoticed, Because if the inspector comes the company can be shut down or receive a big fine. Conclusion I have worked hard on this M, and hope to that I did well. Because when making this M I learned a lot about The standard of working conditions. Sources Unit 36 Booklet