Words: 1098
Personal Ethics Development Paper Personal Ethics Development Paper At birth we are essentially a bare slate. At this time in our lives, we have learned nothing. Our only ability is to cry when we require nourishment or the need for individual vigilance and solace arises. Until certain things are compulsory we are content to lie there and watch the world rotate around us. Throughout life we evolve standards founded on what we have learned or experienced as we develop. The aim of evolving standards in young children is to set up the capability to make sound judgments and ethical conclusions (Kolberg, 1971).
The whole method of worth development is lifelong and relentless (Nucci, 2002). There are as many individual perspectives on standards as there are persons on the planet. Nonetheless, there is a reliable topic that arises when analyzing standards and beliefs. Values work out how an individual answers and reacts to any situation. An individual with good standards is an individual who makes the right conclusion for the right reason. Parents, other family members, religion, teachers, and the general gaining of knowledge assist in the ever evolving development of values.
Often parental educating practices are substantiated with devout religious teachings. Many people equate standards and religious convictions with ethical behavior. An individual can have very high standards, honesty, loving, and giving without possessing any devout convictions in God or salvation. As people proceed through life, they have distinct knowledge that may sway standards in an affirmative or contradictory manner. An individual, who is educated to accept as factual that God can mend all sickness if he pleads, may lose belief if the plea is not answered. The same is true if the individual being prayed for is healed of the illness.
The individual then accepts as factual that the power of plea is worth extending all through life. God becomes a centered part of the development of the enduring standards of the person’s conviction system. Religion is a mighty inspiring force. The first step is to educate an individual regarding what are anticipated behavioral standards. This education may engage the practice of assisting the progeny in memorizing the Ten Commandments or other scriptures that show lesson demeanor (flash. net, 2005). Examples in publications such as The Holy Bible supply parents and educators a rudimentary convention of agreeable demeanor standards.
The Ten Commandments are the directions set by God from which we can evolve general values of demeanor and ethical standards. These values assist us in realizing the characteristics of right, lesson demeanor (flash. net, 2005). Various occurrences or tales of the persons mentioned in The Holy Bible can be used to show the rewards of suitable behavior or the penalties of unsuitable conduct. According to Christian and like beliefs it is incorrect to violate the guidelines of The Ten Commandments or other such guiding principles. Personal ethics may furthermore be called principles or standards because they weigh behavioral expectations.
These ideals are the major convictions parents try to instill in young children and what humanity anticipates of one another without requiring broadcasting of the anticipation in any way. In other words, these behaviors are learned through the teachings of our parents, educators, religious leaders, peers, and friends. Catalano (2000) discusses eight notions engaged in ethics. These values are the cornerstone of most ethical dilemmas. The values are: * Autonomy * Justice * Fidelity * Beneficence * Non-malfeasance * Benchmark of best interest * Obligations
Each standard is significant in stopping and settling ethical problems. These standards and convictions are not generally seen as lawfully binding, but distinguish somebody as “a good person. ” A “good person” values the measures recorded above to make conclusions considering moral and legal practices, enterprise and expert practices, and individual communal practices. Although in most situations, there is not a lawful outcome for behaving unethically; there can be penalties both socially and professionally. Relationships are based on trustworthiness and dependability.
Integrity is an important attribute to own in society. Without these characteristics, persons usually have adversity in connections, both personally and professionally because others anticipate every individual to conform to accepted behaviors. A good demonstration of this is the questions asked regarding the ideas and beliefs of a job candidate during a job interview. Often the interviewer will inquire about these beliefs by asking questions such as the following: * Did the individual illustrate honesty and integrity? * Because not one of us is flawless at everything, recount what could be advised as shortcomings. Did the individual illustrate dependability and reliability in bearing out assignments timely and unquestionably as asserted by the directions? * Did the individual illustrate good work habits: attendance, interpersonal learned all through life, interactions, punctuality, and honesty? In conclusion numerous components assist in the development of standards in individuals. The guidance of parents, religious leaders, and knowledge may change or strengthen any of the standards developed. Someone with acceptable standards make the right choices for the right reasons.
Core standards are what work out the answers an individual has to life situations. People conceive a sequence of affirmations of what is right and what is wrong, what is moral, and what is immoral. Their activities or phrases are directed by an ethical code learned through life knowledge, educating at home and in school, and devout religious training. Ethics characterize what is right and wrong in a society. “According to Aristotle, the development of virtue needs the cultivation of good customs and this in turn directs him to focus the significance of good upbringing, and a good education” (Donaldson, T, & Werhane, P.
H. (Eds. ), 2002, p. 10). Choosing to conform to society’s ethics sets up the individual in the community to be an individual of integrity and honor. References: Barger, R. N. (2002). A summary of lawerence kohlberg’s stages of moral development. http://www. nd. edu/~rbarger/kohlberg. html. Blue Letter Bible (2002). Exodus 20:1-26. http://www. blueletterbible. org/kjv/Exd/top. Catalano, J. T. (2000). Ethics in nursing. In (Ed. ), Nursing now! Today’s issues and tomorrow’s trends (p. ). Philadelphia: Davis. Cline, A. (2002), Ethics and morality? What are they. http://atheism. bout. com/library/FAQs/phil/blfaq_phileth_what. htm. Crain, W. C. (1985). Theories of development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136. Retrieved on http://faculty. plts. edu/gpence/html/kohlberg. htm. Donaldson, T, & Werhane, P. H. (Eds. ). (2002) Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kohlberg, L. (1971). Stages of moral development. From http://www. xenodochy. org/ex/lists/moraldev. html. Nucci, Larry (2002). Moral development and moral education: An overview. http://tigger. uic. edu/~lnucci/MoralEd/overview. html.