Words: 725
A Separate Peace: Final Assignment A Separate Peace by John Knowles is a great work of art. Paul Whitening’s critical essay describes the novel’s strengths, weaknesses, and difficulties, along with the ambiguity of the boys’ conflict in its several phases. All in all, he creates forceful points with a few exceptions of Invalid points. Withering describes the ambiguity of guilt and conscious, art and magic, love and hate, Involvement and Isolation, and self and selflessness. These different types of ambiguity could In fact, be classified as Important.
But my belief Is that In A Separate Peace love and hate, and guilt and unconscious are the two most Important throughout the entire novel. Love and hate Is shown as ambiguous In the novel from Gene’s unsure relationship with Finny due to the lack of understanding If Finny Is a “well-meaning friend who simply resists growing up” (Withering) or a “pernicious fraud acting out of spite or a neurotic who builds protective illusions” (Withering). Guilt and conscious is shown when Finny takes his first fall from the tree, Gene’s reaction is blank; he simply looks down at Finny, and then takes a dive into the water (Knowles).
Paul Withering confirms this by stating”… Gene’s emerging recognition of his guilt in Fanny’s fall signals his passage from childhood innocent play to the responsible ethical concerns of adulthood. ” Gene’s guilt in the novel is the most evident since he has the most to show for it; he tries to be strong, but he eventually gives in to his conscious. Withering proceeds to then describe the strengths in this novel. He explains the ambiguous nature of Fanny’s development. After Fanny’s announcement of knowing all along that the war was going on, illusion became delusion.
After thinking that Finny has a genuine misconception of the human character, he then proceeds to oppress an unpleasant fact. This keeps the reader on their toes begging for more due to the structural dilemma occurring here. There are many weaknesses and difficulties that Withering addresses. One that I completely agree with is the resistance of defining good and evil. It’s hard to conclude the novel’s interaction in allegorical terms. If the novel was parallel to Eden, then it must be completely Ironic, because Finny falls physically without sin while Gene continues to fall spiritually.
It’s also unlike Billy Bud, since Gene Is untouched by the thrust of mistreated Innocence. The notion of suffering as a means to understanding also Is Ironic since the sufferer doesn’t understand the purpose of his suffering and the one who doesn’t suffer both understands and prospers. Withering did a great Job polluting out the ambiguity of the boys’ conflict In several phases , something that most critics overlook and don’t appreciate In A Separate Peace. I believe his points are provide a different perspective that not too many focus on. This critical essay Is a good example of heading In the right direction, Just a little bit far off.
A Separate Peace By structuralism mints with a few exceptions of invalid points. Withering describes the ambiguity of guilt and conscious, art and magic, love and hate, involvement and isolation, and self and selflessness. These different types of ambiguity could in fact, be classified as important. But my belief is that in A Separate Peace love and hate, and guilt and conscious are the two most important throughout the entire novel. Love and hate is shown as ambiguous in the novel from Gene’s unsure relationship with Finny due to the lack of understanding if Finny is a “well-meaning friend who simply resists allegorical terms.
If the novel was parallel to Eden, then it must be completely ironic, also unlike Billy Bud, since Gene is untouched by the thrust of mistreated innocence. The notion of suffering as a means to understanding also is ironic since suffer both understands and prospers. Withering did a great Job pointing out the ambiguity of the boys’ conflict in several phases , something that most critics overlook and don’t appreciate in A Separate Peace. I believe his points are provide a different perspective that not too many focus on. This critical essay is a good example of heading in the right direction, Just a little bit far off.