Words: 750
Antennae: Moral Law vs. Call Law When it comes to morality, what is right and wrong based on a persons personal beliefs, the story of Antigen Is a great literary reference towards the internal struggles of an individual’s morality. Antigen chose to attribute herself with moral law instead tot Screen’s rash and destructive civil law. Antigen felt that no one had the right to decide another’s fate, let alone the fate of someone else’s deceased body.
Antigen believed that her brother deserved a proper burial, although he fought against Thebes he still fought for what he believed in and thought was morally Just. Many individuals make decisions depending on their moral standings. No one can say what Is morally Just or unjust besides the Individual themselves that ultimately make the final decisions. The reader quickly discovers that the moral beliefs of Antennae and Croon will clash into an epic battle of courage and moral beliefs.
Antennae devised her own agenda based on her personal standings that she felt was right. She formed a plan of action and she followed through all the way to the end. She was fully aware of the consequences and faced them with courage and passion. Antigen felt that there was injustice in the law and she could not allow her own brother to be punished in such a grotesque way. Many citizens followed behind her beliefs and motives. Even though she knew her death was Inevitable she strives to achieve what she thought was Just.
Croon sets the standards for civil law within the story of Antigen. Screen’s decision to make it unlawful to bury the deceased body of Policies was based solely on the fact that Policies fought against the Thebe’s. In the eyes of Croon, Policies was a traitor although Polymers was only doing what he believed was Just. Policies knew what challenges he would face and gave his life for his own moral beliefs. Each character in the story chooses their own morality and each proves that what they truly believe is what is most important.
Although Terrifies thoroughly Informed Croon of the consequences of his actions Croon refused to listen. Croon overstepped the moral boundaries of others and suffered for his unjust actions, “you have to repay a corpse of your own… ” “One body you have locked in a tomb… ” “Another… You have forcibly retained here on earth. ” It is noted that the “Furies” will pay back Croon with his “own coin”, or elite. A grand example tot mortality occurred In early 300 BC when Alexander the Great overthrew the entire Persian Empire, The Persian Empire was ruled by King Daring Ill.
When Alexander discovered the murdered body of Daring he still provided Tarsus’s body with an appropriate burial. The difference between Alexander and Croon is that Alexander understands the difference between what Is Just and unjust. It makes It more despicable when It Is made obvious that Policies was Screen’s nephew and Croon still denied his body a proper and respectable burial as he should have received. Alexander understands royalty too great extent unlike Croon who suffers greatly for his morally unjust actions.
Antigen: Moral Law vs. Civil Law By wingback When it comes to morality, what is right and wrong based on a person’s personal beliefs, the story of Antigen is a great literary reference towards the internal law instead of Screen’s rash and destructive civil law. Antigen felt that no one had say what is morally Just or unjust besides the individual themselves that ultimately Antigen and Croon will clash into an epic battle of courage and moral beliefs. Antigen devised her own agenda based on her personal standings that she felt was beliefs and motives.
Even though she knew her death was inevitable she strives to the eyes of Croon, Policies was a traitor although Policies was only doing what he thoroughly informed Croon of the consequences of his actions Croon refused to “Furies” will pay back Croon with his “own coin”, or life. A grand example of mortality occurred in early 300 BC when Alexander the Great overthrew the entire Persian Empire. The Persian Empire was ruled by King Daring Ill. When Alexander discovered the difference between what is Just and unjust. It makes it more despicable when it is morality to a great extent unlike Croon who suffers greatly for his morally unjust