Words: 572
He felt that this could be achieved through education and the unification of cultural beliefs. He believed that citizens that were cultivated people whose intellects and emotions had been developed and matured by conscious people would benefit a nation. He felt that those born into the feudal system were had a personal duty to excel socially by means of power. Those who were of lesser class should also seek out education to better themselves. Confucius felt that love and respect for authority was a key to a reflect society; this strict respect was practiced through rituals and magic.
The Confucius traditions have caused a tradition to set within Its Institution and are extremely active. It has, unfortunately, allowed the political Institution to manipulate the Confucius system, as with Christianity. Charlatanry also preaches a divine, brotherly love. Modern Christianity seeks to discover a rational understanding of the person, as did Confucius; yet, Christianity feels that faith in the Jesus Christ, as a personal savior is essential to this enlightenment. It was also under the guise of
Christianity that it had to confront totalitarian systems uses of power in its sphere of influence. Christians believed in an Absolute against all absolving of the relative, can protest in the name of God. Some would argue that Confucius did support an Absolute, but he described it as the entirety of Heaven. Several scholars believe that his Heaven was analogous to the God unto which Christians served. Christians feel that In order to gain a Jean-like status one must have a serious relationship with the church and Jesus Christ himself.
Confucius differed In that they feel that the body, mind and soul must be recognized as one to reach Jean (Smith). Through education or ritual practices one gains wealth. With wealth one achieved power. These are the essentials to living a good life (BRIre). However, relationships between men are the most desirable. These aspects are the embodiment of Lie. Lie was love for authority and respect for others (Alexander). Christianity also looks at wealth in a slightly different manner. At the heart of the Christian faith and at its source of its traditions in Scripture is the belief in a covenant (Carmen 17).
It is the remises between God and the individual that ensures (through faith) that one’s kindly actions on Earth will be divinely awarded. The five relationships of Jean are also honored In Christianity with references to Honor thy father and mother, for this Is the first commandment with promise (Ephesians 6:1). It Is prevalent that Christianity and Confucius are very similar In their philosophy. Some would argue that Confucius lack of a strong theology Is Its failure to comply with the Christian ethics. Others would say it is there drive to be a virtuous individual compensates for integral part of becoming virtuous.
Even the spiritual outlook on the self is equivalent in the sense of purification. Christians rely on the teachings of Jesus while the Confucius look towards those who have wealthy estates. This point conveys that Christians may be more dependent on their spiritual guidance opposed to the Confucius examination of the worldly infrastructure of trial and error. Thus it is not surprising that when faced with a choice of both religions, an individual’s merit may be the deciding factor on which is more ideal for them.