Words: 1388
The photographer may not be able to resent the company with what we need, want, or expect (Remaining Designs Co. , LTD. 2013). This will only waste time that could be used for photography production. Cuddle Fine Foods also may hire a photographer who produces a weak performance or slow response times (Outsourced E-commerce, 2012). There are also confidentiality and security issues when outsourcing a photographer as they may also work for a competitor (Remaining Designs Co. , LTD, 2013). Legal ramifications that come into play when using an in-house model can be substantial.
If a photographer took a picture in a park and use it n an advertisement you could face legal problems. The best approach to taking pictures and using photos for personal gain would be to become familiar with the parks guidelines. There are other issues that may cause legal issues would be if a photographer wanted to take a picture on someone’s property it may be difficult to gain access to do take said picture. Trespassing just to photograph some picture is a bit much, making sure that you follow guidelines and protocol can only help you obtain the photo you want.
Out- sourcing instead of in-house has more than just legal issues you could run into unwanted results. The legal issues that you may encounter when out- sourcing your photographic needs maybe weak performance, what you pay for may not be what you get. Costs may be misquoted also known as hidden costs and fees. There is definitely a downside of photography done in-house. Employees should have training in use of the specialize equipment needed to produce quality pictures. The budget has to support the cost of hiring a professional as well as purchasing the equipment needed to complete the assignment.
Coordinating schedules with the photographer can cause scheduling conflicts and delays in initiating the project. Equipment and Cost In-house product photography will provide Cuddle Fine Foods with the ability to capture, edit, and format project images using internal resources, equipment, and systems. There are several factors to consider when establishing an in-house photography department. Because our marketing initiative is an ongoing project it will require many product images thus justifying such a lengthy and costly investment (Willowier, 2012).
We must analyze as well as identify the resources required to develop, finance, implement, and maintain an in-house photography system. Develop a uncial plan to feasibly meet our budget constraints (SOMEONE, 2013). In order to maintain an in-house photography system, sufficient planning and preparation is vital. Sufficient space must be developed to efficiently operate a photography studio from the Cuddle Fine F-odds office, which may cost $2500 (Willowier, 2012). An in-house photography department must have adequate staffing.
A qualified product photographer must have a vast array of creativity, expertise, an extensive understanding of photography concepts, camera equipment and accessory knowledge; possess excellent time management and composition skills as well as camera positioning and angle selection skills (Willowier, 2012). Employing such a photographer will require that they be paid salary and wages. According to a study by the U. S. National Salary Averages, a base photographer salary starts at $ASK (Salary Wizard, 2013). Image editors may need to be hired to edit, retouch, review, and format.
A project manager should also be hired to oversee time management and deadlines as well as quality control to assure that image quality meets company standards (SOMEONE, 2013). An employee workspace must be developed as well. Anticipated costs are about $75,000 (Willowier, Train managers and staff to operate the in-house photography system (Willowier, 2012). Estimated training cost should be around $2500 (B & H Foot & Electronics Corp., 2013). Cameras, lenses and lighting setup, work space including office furniture, supplies, and equipment run an estimated cost of $15,000 (B & H Foot& Electronics Corp., 2013).
IT resources must be established for system development and maintenance, which cost S 1500 (B & H Foot & Electronics Corp., 2013). Computer, monitor, and accessories will cost roughly $8000 (B & H Foot & Electronics Corp., 2013). An Adobe Photo Shop program such as Adobe Creative Suite and capture software such as Phase 1 requires a $2500 investment (Willowier, 2012). Below are examples of equipment, software, and a breakdown of the total estimated cost for the in-house project. Photography impact the day-to-day store operations under each model Outsourcing the photography contract will not change the daily operations.
They have been doing the photography like this for some time. However, keeping the photography outsourced can lead to loss of revenue because it costs more for the pictures to be taken and edited (Flatworm Solutions, 2013). The company can acquire more customers if the pictures on the website reflect the actual products, advertisements and employees. Photography done in-house will change the daily operations some. Like mentioned above the appropriate equipment as well as the area where the photography will take place has to be considered.
There will also be management and employee allocated to take on the photography project, this will take company resources. The main functions of the store such as selling gourmet food products will not be affected by the photography infrastructure. How often new photographs could be taken under each model Everyone desires to take professional, perfect, memorable, and persuasive pictures. Depending on the person or the venue pictures can serve different purposes. It does not matter how often pictures should be taken.
The frequency of which pictures are taken is dependent on several key factors: the satisfaction of the client, budget, and the time allotted for the entire project. The budget is also pertinent as this is an additional expense. There are many reasons that pictures can be taken under each model. Despite which model is being used there is always a chance of equipment failure. New strictures can be taken at the discretion of the photographer as well at the desire of the client. The model that is being photographed may request the picture be retaken for personal reasons.
The photographer may not be satisfied with the photos because Of the background lighting maybe Off or the props may not be properly setup or the client may not be satisfied with the model (Then, 2012). The model(s), venue and any props will have to be rented again for the retakes. Retakes can hinder the schedule. Overall there is no limit for taking new pictures under each model; the decision is based ole on the satisfaction of the photographer and the client. The in house structure may allow more flexibility in retaking the photos versus outsourcing the service as this can definitely add an additional expense to the project.
The budget should include the expenses involved in retaking pictures and extra time should be allotted in the schedule for any additional time that maybe needed for new pictures (Flatworm Solutions, 2013). The goal is to have the client completely satisfied and the vision is relayed through the pictures. The potential uses of the photographs and those implications under each model The use of each photograph is there to benefit Cuddle Fine Foods and their marketing arena along with the website to use the photos to show different aspects of the company.
Many implications come along with the marketing side of the company by using contest and photographs in the stores to give Cuddle Fine Foods the edge of the competition. The possibilities are endless with photos and the upgrades the company can create. Conclusion There are copyright laws that the company will have to follow, and release forms to be signed to protect the company as well as the models. If these saws are neglected the company could face detrimental financial and reputation repercussions.
In comparing the pros and cons of outsourcing the photography to a professional photographer versus creating the infrastructure to take the photographs in-house, there is great benefit to creating the infrastructure to take the photographs in-house. There is more flexibility in the schedule as well as the decisions can be decided in-house. There is definitely a downside of photography done in-house. Employees should have training in use of the specialize equipment needed to produce quality pictures (L in, 2005). The budget has to support the cost of hiring a scheduling conflicts and delays in initiating the project.