Words: 817
Explanation of how the selected environmental actor can potentially affect the health or safety of infants is accurate. The health or safety of infants is accurate and supported with detail. The health or safety of infants is accurate and supported with detail and thoughtful insight. 20. 0 % Recommendations Pamphlet does not offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants.
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the lath or safety of infants are minimal or inaccurate. Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety Of infants are accurate. Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and supported with detail.
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and purported with detail and thoughtful insight. 10. 0 % Examples, Interventions, and Suggestions Pamphlet does not offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. Pamphlet offers minimal examples, interventions, and suggestions, or examples are offered but they are inaccurate or not from evidence-based research.
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research and is supported with detail. Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, ND suggestions from evidence-based research and is supported with detail and thoughtful insight. 10. 0 % Written Summary Of Teaching / Learning Interaction Summary of teaching / learning experience is not offered. Summary of teaching / learning interaction is offered but lacks detail and is missing two or more components.
Summary includes student’s reflection on teaching experience but is missing details of the experience and an assessment of learning with the parent. Summary includes demographic information, description of parent response to teaching, and assessment of arena understanding but does not include student’s reflection on teaching experience. Summary includes demographic information, description of parent response to teaching, assessment of parent understanding and student’s impressions of teaching. 20. % Resources Pamphlet does not provide readers with community, national, and Web, based resources. Pamphlet does not provide readers with all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), or resources provided do not adequately address selected environmental factor or are missing descriptions and contact information. Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief descriptions of resource and contact information.
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief descriptions of resource and contact information. Qualities of resources selected indicate thoughtful consideration. Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief descriptions of resource ND contact information. Quality of resources selected and the accompanying descriptions indicate thoughtful consideration. 5. 0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5. 0 % Presentation The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is neat, but major elements are missing. The presentation is good. The overall appearance is neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. 5. % Originality The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights. The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness.
While based on an extensive collection of other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. 5. 0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Us reface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence instruction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/ or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.