Words: 428
Pepsi had an aggressive price, but used a TV campaign promotional approach, using sports and celebrities. Coca-Cola acquired Parse’s leading brands such as Thumbs Up, Lima, and Citric. Weaknesses- Coca-Cola should have been more careful with the promises they made. They entered the market at the wrong time while trying to expand Investment. The Indian government allowed acquisition only if they agreed to sell 49% of equity wealth two years.
Opportunities- Pepsi-Cola International changed heir brand name In India, as directed by the Indian government, to Lear Pepsi because they wanted to make sure they got an early entry while the market was developing. Pepsi formed a joint venture with two local partners. Pepsin’s advertising was held during the cultural festival of Navigator. Pepsi also had the sponsorship of famous Indian cricket and soccer players known globally. On the other hand, Coca- Cola formed a Joint-venture with the local leader.
Coca-Cola hired several famous Plywood actors to endorse their products and used a strategy of “building a innocent using the relevant local idioms. ” Threats- India was in economic depression triggered by the rise in Imported oil prices following the first Gulf War. The Indian government was viewed as unfriendly to foreign Investors. Coca-Cola and Pepsi were also competing with the incorporated fruit drinks beverage segment – a growing industry In India because consumers perceived fruit drinks to be natural, healthy and tasty. Recommendations- All in all, I believe Pepsi has slightly better long-term prospects.
Better evaluation of lattice risks and relationships with the government are needed for both companies to succeed. For future expansions into other countries, I believe the two companies need more accurate prediction of consumption rates. The product is important, but what people think about the product is what is more important. Availability, acceptability and affordability are the three factors of success. Coke and Pepsi Marketing Analysis By lowercased competing in India requires a special type of knowledge and local skills to become expand investment.
The Indian government allowed acquisition only if they agreed to sell 49% of equity within two years. Opportunities- Pepsi-Cola International changed their brand name in India, as directed by the Indian government, to Lear Pepsi developing. Pepsi formed a Joint venture with two local partners. Pepsin’s advertising triggered by the rise in imported oil prices following the first Gulf War. The Indian government was viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Coca-Cola and Pepsi were industry in India because consumers perceived fruit drinks to be natural, healthy and