Words: 562
A presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a president who serves as both head of state and head of government. In a presidential system, the president is often elected directly by the people. This makes the president’s power more legitimate than that of a leader appointed Indirectly. However, this is not a necessary property of a presidential system. Some presidential states have an unelected or indirectly elected head of state. A presidential system establishes the presidency and the legislature as two parallel structures.
This arrangement allows each structure to monitor and check the other, preventing abuses. A president with strong powers can usually enact changes quickly. A president, by virtue of a fixed term, may provide more stably than a prime minister “ho can be dismissed at any time. In most presidential systems, the president Is elected by popular vote, although some such as the United States use an electoral college (which is itself directly elected) or some other method. By this method. He president receives a personal mandate to lead the country, whereas in a reliantly system a candidate might only receive a personal mandate to represent a constituency. Since prime ministers are not elected directly, it could be argued their mandate to lead is not a personal mandate and therefore less legitimate. A presidential system separates the executive from the legislature is sometimes held up as an advantage, in that each branch may scrutinize the actions of the other. In a parliamentary system, the executive is drawn from the legislature, making criticism of one by the other considerably less likely.
Presidential systems an respond more rapidly to emerging situations than parliamentary ones. A prime minister, when taking action, needs to retain the support of the legislature, butt president is often less constrained. When parliamentary systems have multiple parties and governments are forced to rely on coalitions, as they often do in nations that use a system of proportional representation, extremist parties can theoretically use the threat of leaving a coalition to further their agendas. A country under enormous stress may, supporters argue, be better off being led by a president with a axed term than rotating premierships.
France during the Algerian controversy switched to a semi-presidential system as did Sir Lankan during its civil war, while Israel experimented with a directly elected prime minister In 1992. In France and Sir Lankan, the results are widely considered to have been positive. However, In the case of Israel, an unprecedented proliferation of smaller parties occurred, leading to the restoration of the previous system of selecting a prime minister. Presidential Form of Government ay Menominee president who serves as both head of state and head of government.
In a the president’s power more legitimate than that of a leader appointed indirectly. President, by virtue of a fixed term, may provide more stability than a prime minister “ho can be dismissed at any time. In most presidential systems, the president is college (which is itself directly elected) or some other method. By this method, the minister, when taking action, needs to retain the support of the legislature, but a Israel experimented with a directly elected prime minister in 1992. In France and Sir Lankan, the results are widely considered to have been positive.