Words: 714
As far as could remember, since elementary it has always been discussed in my science class that greenhouse gases cause global warming and that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. It has been like that for like… Forever? My mother told me once that one time when she went to Baggie, snow fell. I really don’t know if she was telling the truth but being a child, I believed her. When she told me that stow, I guess I was 5 years old. During those times, going out in the sun during 9 o’clock in the morning is still safe and it won’t bring you any harm. The sun’s rays were still “friendly’.
Comparing those mimes to the present time, one would note that: there were lesser vehicles; electricity was not a “major major” commodity; we have more trees and forests; deforestation and kayaking were not that rampant… Generally, we were living a simple, echo-friendly and less innovative kind of life. Nowadays, our way of life has improved but it had adverse effects. The one that has been greatly affected was the environment. As our way of living continues to improve, so does the temperature. The temperature improves in the way that it continues increasing.
As men find ways in improving their way f living, they intentionally and unintentionally destroy the environment -?? the increase in global temperature seems to go with it. Basing on what is happening today and on what had happened, it seems very logical that global warming may really be man-made. It seems to be caused greatly by man’s activities. Man has been destroying the Earth and global warming is one of the indicators that it is indeed in the verge of destruction. But the point of “A Great Global Warming Swindle??’ is that the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere is much greater than the amount of carbon oxide. So what? ” you may ask. It matters because, as a matter of fact, water vapor itself is a greenhouse gas. This somehow piqued my curiosity. Was I wrong for believing that global warming is man-made? To feed man’s curiosity there are two things, among all innovations and inventions, that were proven to be very helpful -?? research and the internet. Though research in high school has deprived me of one factor essential in a person’s biological growth -?? that is sleep -?? I did a little of it to support my stand by basing on the opinions of others.
Here is a summary of what I have read from different sources… Although the documentary was welcomed by global warming skeptics, it was criticized by scientific organizations and individual scientists (including two of the film’s contributors). The film’s critics argued that it had misused and fabricated data, relied on out-of-date research, employed misleading arguments, and misrepresented the position of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate “… They completely misrepresented me. My views were distorted by the context in which they placed them.
I was misled as to what it was going to be about. I was told about six months ago that this was to be a programmer about how complicated it is to understand what is going on. If they had told me even the title of the programmer, I would have absolutely refused to be on it. I am the one who has been swindled… “(Professor Carl Hunch, Pure Propaganda -?? The Great Global Warming. ) “… In other words, ICC does not initiate the warnings, but acts as an amplifier once they are underway. ” (Professor Asseverating, pure Propaganda -?? The Great Global Warming. )
According to some, the documentary might have wrongly presented or misinterpreted the ideas of the scientists and the data they have gathered. They might have spread absurd arguments and have caused great confusion, especially to the viewers. To others, the documentary might have been enlightenment to what is really happening. But in the end, it is up for us to choose which side we are going to believe. It does not matter if you are the only one who seems to have a different view compared to others. Always remember, there are no wrong opinions… Only those that oppose everyone else’s.