Words: 980
In an effort to cut down prison populations in New Jersey as well as the recidivism rate. He state has contracted with Treatment Centers with the hopes that prison populations would decrease and help references reintegrate into society as productive citizens. According to Clarke, Governor Chris Christie insisted on budget cuts in 2010, except when it came to funding treatment centers, formerly called halfway houses. Governor Chris Christie wanted to increase funding for treatment centers by SO,1 million, $61. Million to $54,6 million, which would benefit prisoners after they were released. Clarke, M. 2011 Also, According to Clarke, the increased funding would also benefit the overseer close friend and political advisor William J. Plastics, who was a senior vice president and general counsel for Community Education Centers (SEC), Political has a long relationship with Governor Christie. He helped run the governor’s campaign and served as co-chair of the governor’s inaugural committee.
In addition, Plastics has personally contributed $26,650 to the Republican Party and Community Education Centers’ chairman, John C. Clan contributed $138,525 and SEC has contributed $372,350 to both parties. Clarke, 2011. Conflict of Interest Providing treatment and education services for references is a worthy cause especially if the success rate is proven. However, the issue under examination is whether Governor Chris Christie entered the contract with SEC unethically because of his close relationship with William Plastics.
Was nepotism involved and was there a conflict of interest? According to Clarke, eight vendors have Department of Correction contracts for treatment center beds but SEC is not one of them. SEC is able to provide the majority Of the state’s treatment center beds because it does so through a non- refit corporation, Education and Health Centers of America (EACH). EACH has the State contracts While SEC supplies the treatment center beds. Clarke, M. 011 THE ASP CODE OF ETHICS UNDER PERSPECTIVE The American Society for Public Administration (ASP) advances the science, art, and practice of public administration. The Society affirms its responsibility to develop the spirit of responsible professionalism within its membership and to increase awareness and commitment to ethical principles and standards among all those who work in public service in all sectors. Governor Chris Christie public service person is a member of this Society and thus is bounded by its codes of ethics.
Code of ethics number three (3) says that; Promote democratic participation. Inform the public and encourage active engagement in governance. Be open, transparent and responsive, and respect and assist all persons in their dealings with public organizations (“American Society for Public Administration”, 2013). From the foregoing it does not seem that Governor Chris Christie is adhering to this code of ethics. The relationship between the Centre and the Governor smacks of corruption and conflicts of interest. There is no transparency and openness as enjoined by the Code of ethics.
One will think that because of the relationship between the Governor and the management of the center the Governor should not be seen advocating for increments in the budget for the operation of the center, especially after he has publicly called for budget cut. Where lies the principle Of accountability and transparency if people Who are known financiers of his political are awarded lucrative contracts. There are more questions than answers Code Of Ethics Number (6) Demonstrate personal integrity. Adhere to the highest standards of conduct to inspire public confidence and trust in public service.
Personal Integrity is very important in public service. This therefore explains its capture in the code of ethics of the American Public, Governor Christie therefore must demonstrate personal integrity and inspire public confidence and trust in the public service (“American Society for Public Administration”, 2013). Impact on Policy Development and Implementation The impact moral ethics has on policy development and implementation is fear to biased funding when stakeholders have a personal interest in a public sector organization polices will be drafted to benefit the stakeholders instead of the organizations participants.
In an organization everyone has a specified role which serves as a basis on how services will be provided the overall goal is to ensure polices are adhered to when there are relationships that present a conflict of interest polices are developed and implemented to the benefit of the administrators. “Organizational ethics is inextricably linked to leadership ethics (and vice versa) and concerns critical questions of integrity, responsibility and decision making.
At its most basic, it entails a comprehensive framework that involves ‘the creation and implementation of processes, procedures and policies that seek to ensure the performance of an organization or institution is consistent With its fundamental purpose(s) or ethical aims” (Johnston, 2013). Stakeholders having self-interest affect an organization it causes the organizations integrity to be questioned Which leads to distrust in the policy development therefore impacting the organization in a way that will cause unfavorable outcomes. Performance management reforms require policymakers ND administrators to develop legislation that outlines performance principles, expectations, and ramifications in a manner that leads to meaningful increases in public sector outcomes” (Patrick, 2013). Integrity is most important in an organizations survival public organizations are deemed as high performers this stakeholders having a personal interest leads to manipulation and reported outcomes that are favorable to the organization, performance policies are lost efficiency and effectiveness are compromised participants are misled, and ultimately trust is weakened.
Conclusion Upholding ethical standards in organizations is important to it success stakeholders should uphold moral and ethical standard when implementing polices to ensure they are doing for the public they serve, Having self-interest leads to mistrust from communities which in turn hinders program performance the public interest is what makes any organization successful sticking to the mission and vision ensures community organizations are providing services that align vita a code of ethics and drives success. References Patrick, B. (2013). Ethics and Performance Management.